Most developers have no idea how their prompting actually performs — or how they compare. Prism scores every session so you finally know where you stand.
Check your ScoreWorks with Claude Code · Codex & Gemini coming soon
Context is this cycle's bottleneck — point at files with @file instead of describing them.
Speed hides the real problem — you don't know which prompts are wasting your time.
of developers have no idea how their prompts actually perform
No score. No signal. Just the next session.
of token spend is wasted on vague, over-injected prompts
Burning budget with no visibility into why.
tools give you a score on your vibe coding performance
Until now.
Runs automatically as each goal wraps up.
No interruptions while you code.
Prism logs every prompt silently in the background.
Topic shifts, or you /clear — Prism closes the sub-session.
One question: did it hit the goal without rework?
Score, grade, and the one thing to fix next.
"Context bottleneck — use @file references instead of describing where files live."
Turn-by-turn replay with Prism annotations — see where the goal drifted, why it took extra turns, and what to write instead.
Better prompting means fewer correction turns — and less of your Claude plan burned on wasted tokens. Same subscription. More done.
Every sub-session is graded across Clarity, Context, Verification and Workflow. Prism surfaces one bottleneck at a time — and what to write instead.
Hours lost to weekly limits, counted. Prism shows which days you stalled and which prompts burned the budget that got you there.
Illustrative example — sample sub-session, not customer data.
Prism traced the waste to one rubric category. Fixed in a single DIV cycle.
Illustrative example — sample figures, not customer results.
Illustrative example — sample figures, not customer results.
Mar 9 is the first week after Prism flagged the retry storms. Fewer wasted turns, fewer days at the ceiling.
Illustrative example — sample figures, not customer results.
Four screens that turn scattered sessions into one view — where the team is strong, where it's stuck, and where the spend actually goes.
Start your team's free trial14 days free · No credit card
Every number is shown against last week, and risk signals link straight to the detail behind them. This week's priority is on screen before you go looking for it.
Which areas the team touched, alongside merged PRs and review turnaround. Per-developer reads are written as coaching, not scoring — the question they answer is who needs support, and with what.
The same task on a different model costs very different amounts. Prism names the specific waste and what fixing it would save. Not "you used a lot" — here, this much.
What happened this week in plain language, organised around what changed. Export to PDF or Markdown for the management report.
Prism is not a surveillance tool.
The design makes sure of it.
Free forever for individual developers.
Upgrade when your team needs visibility.
Personal is free forever. Team starts with a 14-day free trial — create a team from your own account, no credit card required.